Везде
MANAGERIALISM AND THE ACADEMIC PROFESSION. CONFLICT AND INTERACTION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MANAGERIALISM AND THE ACADEMIC PROFESSION. CONFLICT AND INTERACTION
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Roman Abramov 
Edition
Issue №7
Pages
37-47
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of conflicts between academic autonomy and managerial procedures in a modern Russian University. The first part provides an overview of the concepts of managerialism and academic autonomy, while the second part examines the results of an empirical study of the relations between administrative staff and the administrative corps at a Russian University.
Keywords
academic profession * managerialism • academic autonomy • University.
Date of publication
01.07.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
542
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Radaev V. Pyat' printsipov postroeniya novogo universiteta // Rro et Contra. 2010. № 3. T. 14 (maj–iyun'). S. 6–18.
 2. Enteman W.F. Managerialism: The emergence of a new ideology. Madison: University of Wisconsin press, 1993.
 3. Amerikanskie burzhuaznye teorii upravleniya. Kriticheskij analiz / Pod. red. Mil'nera B.Z. M.: Mysl', 1978; Gvishiani D.M. Organizatsiya i upravlenie. M.: Nauka, 1972;. Kochevrin Yu.B. Ehvolyutsiya menedzherizma (opyt politiko-ehkonomicheskogo analiza). M.: Nauka, 1985; Selivanov V.N. Menedzherizm – apologetika sovremennogo kapitalizma (politiko-pravovoj analiz). Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1977; SShA: organizatsionnye formy i metody upravleniya promyshlennymi korporatsiyami / Pod red. B.Z. Mil'nera. M.: Nauka, 1972; Popov G.Kh. Problemy teorii upravleniya. M.: Ehkonomika, 1970; Podmarkov V. Vvedenie v promyshlennuyu sotsiologiyu. M.: Mysl', 1973; Setrov M.I. Osnovy funktsional'noj teorii organizatsii. Filosofskij ocherk. L.: Nauka, 1972; Afanas'ev V. Chelovek v sistemakh upravleniya. M: Znanie, 1975; Lapin N.I. Problemy sotsiologicheskogo analiza organizatsionnykh sistem // Voprosy filosofii. 1974. № 7; Kochevrin Yu.B. Ehvolyutsiya menedzherizma (opyt politiko-ehkonomicheskogo analiza). M.: Nauka, 1985; Salmin A.M. Neokorporativizm v stranakh Zapada: nauchnoanalitich. obzor. M.: INION AN SSSR, 1984.
 4. Gvishiani D.M. Sotsiologiya biznesa. Kriticheskij ocherk amerikanskoj teorii menedzhmenta. M.: Sotsehkgiz, 1962.
 5. Boje D.M. Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as Tamaraland // Academy of Management Journal. 1995. 38 (4). P. 997–1035; Boje D.M. The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1991. 36 (1). P. 106–126.
 6. Pollitt C. Managerialism and the Public Service; the Anglo-American experience. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1990.
 7. Maor M. Paradox of Managerialism // Public Administration Review. Vol. 59. № 1. (Jan.-Feb., 1999). P. 5–18.
 8. Hussey T., Smith P. The Trouble with Higher Education. A Critical Examination of our Universities. New York: Routledge, 2010. P. 19–29.
 9. Docherty T. The English Question or Academic Freedom. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2008.
 10. Makintajr A. Posle dobrodeteli: Issledovaniya teorii morali. M.: Akademicheskij Proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 2000.
 11. Gay P. Making up Managers: Bureaucrary, Enterprise and the Liberal Art of Separatoin // The British journal of sociology. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 655–674; Mir A. The Hegemonic Discourse of Management Texts // Journal of management education. 2003. Vol. 27. № 6. P. 734–738.
 12. Parsons T., Platt G. The American University. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1973. P. 267–282.
 13. Shpakovskaya L. Politika vysshego obrazovaniya v Evrope i Rossii. SPb.: Norma, 2007. S. 25–36.
 14. Ordorika I. The Limits of University Autonomy: Power and Politics at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México // Higher Education. 2003. Vol. 46. № 3. P. 361–388.
 15. Kalkhun K. Universitet i obschestvennoe blago // PROGNOZIΣ. 2006. № 3 (7)7 S. 125–145.
 16. Slark B.R. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching, 1987.
 17. Clark B.R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: International Association of Universities Press and Pergamon, 1998.
 18. Liotar Zh.F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. M.: Aletejya, 1998. S. 118.
 19. Kurakin D., Filippov A. Vozmozhnost' korporatsii: k sotsiologicheskomu opisaniyu universiteta // Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2006. № 4–5. S. 48–49.
 20. Gumport P.J. Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives // Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning. 2000. № 39. P. 67–91.
 21. Felt U. Special Case Studies Decision-Making Structures and Human Resources Management in Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom / Preprint.
 22. Geiger R.I. Privatization of Higher Education: International Trends & Issues. Conference Report, International Council for Educational Development, Racine, Wisconsin, June 15–18, 1987. Princeton, N.J.: International Council for Educational Development 1988; Kerr C. The American Mixture of Higher Education in Perspective: Four Dimensions // Higher Education. 1990. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 1–19.
 23. Henkel M. Can academic autonomy survive in the knowledge society? A perspective from Britain // Higher Education Research & Development. 2007. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 87–99; Yokoyama K. Changing Definitions of University Autonomy: The Cases of England and Japan // Higher Education in Europe. 2007. Vol. 32. № 4. P. 400–409; Chiang Li-Chuan. The relationship between university autonomy and funding in England and Taiwan // Higher Education. 2004. № 48. P. 189–212.
 24. Newson J., Polster C. Reclaiming Our Centre: Towards a Robust Defence of Academic Autonomy // Science Studies. 2001. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 55–75.
 25. Volkov V., Kharkhordin O. Teoriya praktik. SPb.: Evropejskij universitet, 2008. S. 72–75.
 26. Boldri K. Sotsial'nye aspekty kontorskikh pomeschenij // Mezhdunarodnyj obzor truda. 1997. T. 136. № 3–4. S. 180–192.
 27. Gornitzka A., Larsen I.M. Towards Professionalisation? Restructuring of Administrative Work Force in Universities // Higher Education. 2004. Vol. 47. № 4 (Jun., 2004). P. 455–471.
 28. Rozovski G. Universitet. Rukovodstvo dlya vladel'tsa. M.: Evrejskij universitet, 1995.
 29. Boltanski L., Teveno L. Sotsiologiya kriticheskoj sposobnosti // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2000. T. III. № 3. S. 66–84; Kharkhordin O.V. Pragmaticheskij povorot: sotsiologiya L. Boltanski i L. Teveno // Sotsiol. issled. 2007. № 1. S. 32–41.
 30. Rhoades G. The study of the Academic Profession/Sociology of Higher Education. Contributions and their contexts. Ed. by P.J. Gumport. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007. P. 113–146.
 31. Barnett R., Middlkherst R. Poteryannaya professiya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Evrope. 1993. № 2. S. 133–155.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate