Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy

Yermakova, Оlga P.

doi:10.31857/S160578800018922-0

English

Home>Issue 1>Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy

Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy

Annotation

PII

S160578800018922-0-

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Оlga P. Yermakova Send message

Affiliation: Kaluga State K.E. Tsiolkovsky University
Address: 26 Stepana Razina Str., Kaluga, 248023, Russia

Edition

Volume 81 Issue 1

Pages

51-55

Abstract

The article discusses some features of actant and non-actant metonymy, complementing their main differences. It is noted that the set and content of actants depends on the semantic valence of the verb producing Nomina actionis. Inactive metonymy, its activity and other features are due only to the existence of certain realities. It is also established that the meanings of some types of actant and non-actant metonymy are not embodied in verbal units and therefore are not marked in explanatory dictionaries.

Keywords

Actant and non-actant substantive metonymy, inversely directed metonymy (from actant to action), types of metonymy that do not generate verbal units

Received

16.12.2021

Date of publication

11.03.2022

Number of purchasers

Views

923

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Previous versions

S160578800018922-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 25.02.2022

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Yermakova �. Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy // Известия Российской Академии наук. Серия литературы и языка / Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka. – 2022. – V. 81. – Issue 1 C. 51-55 . URL: https://litjazras.ru/s020736760016809-8-1/?version_id=92067. DOI: 10.31857/S160578800018922-0
MLA	Yermakova, Оlga P "Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy." Известия Российской Академии наук. Серия литературы и языка / Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka. 81.1 (2022).:51-55. DOI: 10.31857/S160578800018922-0
APA	Yermakova �. (2022). Remarks on the Different Nature of Metonymy. Известия Российской Академии наук. Серия литературы и языка / Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka. vol. 81, no. 1, pp.51-55 DOI: 10.31857/S160578800018922-0

References

1. Apresyan Yu.D. Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka. M.: Nauka, 1974.

2. Pokrovskij M.M. Izbrannye raboty po yazykoznaniyu / [Predisl. V.V. Vinogradova]. M.: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1959.

3. Ginzburg E.L. Konstruktsii polisemii v russkom yazyke. Taksonomiya i metonimiya. M.: Nauka, 1985.

4. Eryomin A.N., Petrova O.O. Substantivnaya metonimiya v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya i modeli realizatsii. M.: Flinta, 2018.

5. Koroleva O.Eh. Metonimiya kak tip znacheniya: semanticheskaya kharakteristika i sfery upotrebleniya. Obninsk: Institut munitsipal'nogo upravleniya, 2002.

6. Rozina R.I. Semanticheskoe razvitie slova v russkom literaturnom yazyke i sovremennom slenge: glagol. M.: Azbukovnik, 2005.

7. Sandakova M.V. Metonimiya prilagatel'nogo v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Kirov, 2004.

8. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka pod redaktsiej prof. D.N. Ushakova. M.: Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya, 1935–1941.

9. Petrova O.O. O sinkretizme metonimii i analogii // Kazanskaya nauka. 2021. № 7.

10. Ermakova O.P. Semanticheskij ehllipsis ili semanticheskij sdvig (o razgovornom upotreblenii konstruktsij tipa posle seledki khochetsya pit', opozdal iz-za detej) // Yazyk: poiski, fakty, gipotezy. K 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika N.Yu. Shvedovoj. M.: Nauka, 2016.

11. Tolkovyj slovar' russkogo yazyka s vklyucheniem svedenij o proiskhozhdenii slov / Otv. red. akademik N.Yu. Shvedova. M.: Azbukovnik, 2007.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate

References

Comments

Via social network