- PII
- S102694520024326-9-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S102694520024326-9
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 2
- Pages
- 139-144
- Abstract
In this article, on the example of the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, the correlation between the freedom of profession and the constitutional guarantee of private property in Germany will be considered. As an example, one of the early cases of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany called “District Chimney Sweeper”, which was decided on April 30, 1952, is taken. In this case, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany came to the conclusion that the “enterprise” of a chimney sweep is a craft in which the private law aspects of economic life completely fade into the background, and in which moments of strict public law regulation certainly dominate. This circumstance does not allow us to bring the concept of “guaranteed right to engage in a craft” under “property” in the sense of Article 14 of the German Basic Law of 1949.
- Keywords
- Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, property, guarantees, public law regulation, enterprise, economic life, freedom of profession, craft
- Date of publication
- 15.03.2023
- Year of publication
- 2023
- Number of purchasers
- 14
- Views
- 536
References
- 1. Badura P. Der Eigentumsschutz des eingerichteten und ausgeübten Gewerbebetriebs // Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts. Band 98, Heft 2. 1973. S. 153.
- 2. Hinz Th. Neugründungen von kleingewerblichen und mittelständischen Betrieben - Vergleichende Analysen aus Ost- und Westdeutschland // Kleinbetriebe in den neuen Bundesländern. Hrsg. M. Brussig u.a. Opladen, 1997. S. 358.
- 3. Wagner G. Geschichte des Schornsteins und des Schornsteinfegerhandwerks vom IX. bis XX. Jahrhundert. - Essen. Düsseldorf, 1987. S. 11 f.
