Везде
The use of artificial intelligence in the administration of criminal justice: problems and prospects
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The use of artificial intelligence in the administration of criminal justice: problems and prospects
Annotation
PII
S102694520018277-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Maxim A. Malina 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6862-718X
Occupation: associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminology
Affiliation: Southern Federal University
Address: Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
91-97
Abstract

The article explores the problems of using digital technologies in the administration of criminal justice. The conclusion is justified that in evidence artificial intelligence can be used to a very limited extent - only to control the admissibility of evidence. Consideration is being given to the possibility of using digital software systems to qualify the act committed by the accused. The erroneous approach is justified, according to which artificial intelligence can take part in the sentencing of the defendant. As the main direction for the use of information technologies in criminal proceedings, the solution of the tasks of optimizing hardware and technical, organizational, documentary and other routine processes, as well as work to eliminate errors of a legal and technical nature, is determined

Keywords
criminal procedure, collection of evidence, evaluation of evidence, admissibility of evidence, theory of formal evidence, artificial intelligence, court, internal conviction of the judge, justice, interpretation of legal norm, imposition of punishment
Received
06.05.2021
Date of publication
17.03.2022
Number of purchasers
16
Views
1993
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S102694520018277-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.03.2022
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Alekseev S.S. Theory of Law. M., 1995. P. 256 (in Russ.).

2. Vladimirov L.E. The doctrine of criminal evidence. Tula, 2000. P. 86, 110 (in Russ.).

3. Golovko L.V. Digitalization in criminal proceedings: local optimization or global revolution? // Herald of Economic Security. 2019. No. 1. P. 15 - 25 (in Russ.).

4. Ilyin I.A. On the essence of legal consciousness. M., 1993. P. 82 (in Russ.).

5. Kolokolov N.A. Computer instead of judge - arithmetic instead of soul // Criminal proceedings. 2019. No. 3. P. 7 (in Russ.).

6. Koni A.F. Selected works / comp. A.B. Amelin. M., 1956. P. 19, 20, 30, 32 (in Russ.).

7. The course of criminal procedure / ed. by L.V. Golovko. M., 2016. P. 422 (in Russ.).

8. Lessig L. Artificial intelligence will displace a wide layer of lawyers // Law. 2019. No. 5. P. 17 (in Russ.).

9. Mal’ko A.V., Afanasyev S.F., Borisova V.F., Krotkova N.V. Problems of digitalization in the field of justice // State and Law. 2020. No. 10. P. 151 - 159. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520012242-7 (in Russ.).

10. Mal’ko A.V., Kostenko M.A. Digital technologies in the judicial system: problems of implementation // Russ. justice. 2019. No. 2. P. 53 (in Russ.).

11. Neznamov A.V. On the directions of the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies into the judicial system // Information Law. 2019. No. 3. P. 46 (in Russ.).

12. Nekrasov V.N. Criminal liability of robots: current problems and directions of further development // State and Law. 2019. No. 5. P. 135–137 (in Russ.).

13. Rahimov I.M., Alikperov H.D. Electronic scales of justice (goals, opportunities, advantages) // Criminal proceedings. 2019. No. 3. P. 9 - 11, 13 (in Russ.).

14. Foynitsky I. Ya. Course of criminal proceedings. SPb., 1996. Vol. I. P. 13 (in Russ.).

15. Higgins T. Elon Mask Lays Out Worst-Case Scenario for AI Threat // The Wall Street Journal. 2017. July 15.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate