Везде
Law, law enforcement and legal hermeneutics
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Law, law enforcement and legal hermeneutics
Annotation
PII
S102694520018271-9-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Viktor N. Kornev 
Occupation: Head of Vitruk Department of Constitutional Law
Affiliation: Russian state University of Justice
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Vladimir I. Kononenko
Occupation: Head of Radutnaya Department of Criminal Procedure Law
Affiliation: Russian State University of Justice
Address: Russia
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
54-63
Abstract

Law finds its expression and existence in language. The relationship between law and language determines its interpretative nature. In the process of applying normative legal acts, they always need to be interpreted by the law enforcement officer in order to clarify the meaning and will expressed in them, intentionally aimed at establishing certain behavior and regulating the significant social relations. The problem of understanding normative legal acts, achieved in the process of their interpretation is one of the most important tasks of subjects authorized to apply the law. The article deals with the problems of interpretation, understanding and application of law as a single process, using examples from judicial practice. The essence and content of the main directions in hermeneutics as a theory of interpretative practice and philosophy of understanding, its main canons are studied. In this regard, the subject of analysis is the works of G. Gadamer, E. Betti, L. Wittgenstein, M. Heidegger, A. Kaufman, A. Aarnio, P. Riker on the philosophy and theory of language and legal hermeneutics. The article defines the categories "understanding", "pre-understanding" ("predestination») and in this context, the significance of the explanations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for the law enforcement and interpretative practice of courts. Examples from judicial practice show cases of cancellation of court decisions due to incorrect interpretation of laws, as well as when law-making is actually carried out under the guise of interpretation.

Keywords
law, court, interpretation, interpretation, hermeneutics, pre-understanding, understanding, predestination, law, Constitution, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, explanation
Received
09.06.2021
Date of publication
17.03.2022
Number of purchasers
16
Views
1126
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S102694520018271-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 17.01.2022
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Betty E. Hermeneutics as a general methodology of the sciences of the spirit / transl. from German by E.V. Borisova. M., 2011. P. 21, 29 (in Russ.).

2. Vdovina I.S. Paul Riker: on the “Elysian fields” of philosophy. M., 2019. P. 166 (in Russ.).

3. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Research // Languages as an image of the world. M., 2003. P. 24, 346 (in Russ.).

4. Gadamer G. Truth and method: Fundamentals of philosophical Hermeneutics / transl. from German; general ed. and introductory article by B.N. Bessonov. M., 1988. P. 363 (in Russ.).

5. Kornev V.N., Belova M.A. The understanding Philosophy of Law by Arthur Kaufman // State and Law. 2019. No. 5. P. 14 - 17 (in Russ.).

6. Lazarev V.V. The place of judicial practice in the legal system of Russia // Judicial practice in the modern legal system of Russia / ed. by T. Ya. Khabrieva, V.V. Lazarev. M., 2017. P. 37 (in Russ.).

7. Riker P. Hermeneutics. Ethics. Politics. M., 1995. P. 4 (in Russ.).

8. Riker P. Understanding and explanation // New Philosophical Encyclopedia: in 4 vols. M., 2001. Vol. 3. P. 283 (in Russ.).

9. Heidegger M. Being and time / transl. from German V.V. Bibikhin. M., 2011. P. 48 (in Russ.).

10. Aarnio A. On Legal Reasoning. Turku, 1977. P. 126–129.

11. Betti E. Die Hermeneutik als allgemeine Methodik der Geistwissenschaften. Tubingen, 1972. S. 19, 41.

12. Ingram D. Law. Key Concepts in Philosophy. London, 2006. P. 205.

13. Kaufmann A. Analogie und Natur der Sache. 2. Aufl. Heidelberg, 1982.

14. Kley A. Wittgenstein und modern juristische Methodik. Recht: Zeitschrift fur juristische Weiterbildung und Praxis, 14 (5). Zurich, 1996. S. 189–199.

15. Mahlmann M. Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie. 4. Auflage. Zurich, 2016. S. 311.

16. Ruthers, Fischer, Birck. Rechtstheorie mit Juristischer Methodenlehre 10. uberarbeitete Auflage. München, 2016. S. 101–141.

17. Sadowski-Zirk M. Wprowadzenie do Filozofii Prawa. Warszawa, 2011. S. 78.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate