Везде
Cyborg in the “mirror” of philosophical reflection (using the example of the game “Cyberpunk 2077”)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Cyborg in the “mirror” of philosophical reflection (using the example of the game “Cyberpunk 2077”)
Annotation
PII
S023620070019078-2-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana Obolkina 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6644-104X
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 16 Sofia Kovalevskaya Str., Ekaterinburg 620108, Russian Federation
Edition
Volume 33 Issue 1
Pages
122-138
Abstract

The cyborg is the most important futurological character, and its analysis is the purpose of this article. In order for the understanding of the Cyborg not to be limited to the idea of the complementation of man and machine, philosophical reflection is required. Methodological basis of the research: the method of topological reflection allows analyzing works of mass art as the “subconscious” of culture. The author analyzes the topos and the Cyborg concept, comparing them. The article considers the computer game “Cyberpunk 2077” as a Cyborg topos. The concept of the cyborg is analyzed mainly on the example of the philosophical concept of “cybergotics” (N. Land). The author suggests a thought experiment: taking into account the arguments of the “materialistic” direction of media theory and the concept of a Cyborg, present the concept of a game about a Cyborg, and then compare it with the analyzed topos. As a result, it becomes clear that the concept and the topos of the Cyborg represent opposite cultural strategies, although we are talking about the same futurological character. This internal conflict allows us to talk about the Cyborg as a “new Proteus”: he is “multi-faceted” and is associated with the “art of concealment”. The Cyborg “hides” deep intentions, and this prevents us from considering the Cyborg in the spirit of exclusively transhumanism. The author shows that the connotations of the machinery in this image are related to the needs of the “upgrade”. It is designed to preserve human identity. The scientific novelty of the research is to develop a reflexive approach to the Cyborg as an important media figure, as well as to explore its futurological potential. The differentiation of the concept and the topos allows for a more comprehensive view of a complex cultural phenomenon. A new interpretation of the Cyborg is proposed. The results of the conducted research can be used in philosophical futurology (as arguments against excessive optimism of transhumanistic ideas), in media studies. In addition, the proposed approach can contribute to the development of the method of topological reflection.

Keywords
cyborg, futurology, transhumanism, concept, topos, human identity, proteism
Received
14.03.2022
Date of publication
14.03.2022
Number of purchasers
14
Views
1264
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S023620070019078-2-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 14.03.2022
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Bilinskij B. Drevnegrecheskie agony: prevoskhodstvo telesnosti i voskhischenie intellektom // Sport, dukhovnye tsennosti, kul'tura: sb. Vyp. 3. / sost., red. V.V. Kuzin, V.I. Stolyarov, N.N. Chesnokov. M.: Gumanitarnyj tsentr «SpArt» RGAFK, 1997. S. 317–339.

2. Bilinsky B. “Drevnegrecheskie agony: prevoskhodstvo telesnosti i voskhishchenie intellektom” [Ancient Greek agons: the superiority of physicality and the admiration of the intellect]. Sport, duhovnye cennosti, kul'tura: sb. [Sports, spiritual values, culture: collection], compil., ed. by V.V. Kuzin, V.I. Stolyarov, N.N. CHesnokov. Moscow: Gumanitarnyj centr “SpArt” RGAFK Publ., 1997. P. 317–339.

3. Brajant L.R. Demokratiya ob'ektov / Per. s angl. O.S. Myshkinoj. Perm': Gile Press, 2019.

4. Bryant L.R. Demokratiya ob"ektov. [The democracy of objects], transl. from English by O.S. Myshkina. Perm: Gile-Press Publ., 2019.

5. Giddens Eh. Ustroenie obschestva: Ocherk teorii strukturatsii. 2-e izd. / Per. s angl. I. Tyurinoj. M.: Akademicheskij Proekt, 2003.

6. Giddens A. Ustroenie obshchestva: Ocherk teorii strukturacii. [The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration], transl. from English by I. Tyurina. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt Publ., 2003.

7. Delyoz Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya? / Per. s fr. S.N. Zenkina. M.: Institut ehksperimental'noj sotsiologii, Spb.: Aletejya, 1998.

8. Deleuze J., Guattari P. CHto takoe filosofiya? [What is Philosophy?], transl. from French by S.N. Zenkin. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology Publ., St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 1998.

9. Dubrovskij D.I. Nejroehtika: nekotorye aktual'nye filosofsko-metodologicheskie voprosy // Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2020. T. IV, № 1. S. 24–41.

10. Dubrovskiy D.I. “Nejroetika: nekotorye aktual'nye filosofsko-metodologicheskie voprosy” [Neuroethics: some current philosophical and methodological issues]. Philosophy. Journal of Higher School of Economics. 2020. Vol. IV, N 1. P. 24–41.

11. Zhilina A.V. O preimuschestvakh materialisticheskogo podkhoda v teorii media // Filosofskij zhurnal. 2017. № 3. C. 93–111.

12. Zhilina A.V. “O preimushchestvah materialisticheskogo podhoda v teorii media” [On the advantages of a materialist approach to media theory]. Filosofskij zhurnal. 2017. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 93–111.

13. Ivanova M.V. Pokhvala sokrytiyu: o proteisticheskoj modeli filosofstvovaniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2017. № 5. S. 102–111.

14. Ivanova M.V. “Pohvala sokrytiyu: o proteisticheskoj modeli filosofstvovaniya” [The Praise of Concealment: On the Proteistic Model of Philosophizing]. Voprosy filosofii. 2017. N 5. P. 102–111.

15. Kiborgi iz chreva beremennogo monstra: teoreticheskie figury Donny Kharauehĭ // Sigma. 27 iyulya 2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://syg.ma/@sygma/kiborghi-iz-chrieva-bieriemiennogho-monstra-tieorietichieskiie-fighury-donny-kharauei (data obrascheniya: 03.03.2021).

16. “Kiborgi iz chreva beremennogo monstra: teoreticheskie figury Donny Harauei” [Cyborgs from the womb of a pregnant monster: the theoretical figures of Donna Haraway]. Sig.ma. July 27, 2017 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://syg.ma/@sygma/kiborghi-iz-chrieva-bieriemiennogho-monstra-tieorietichieskiie-fighury-donny-kharauei (date of access: 03.03.2021).

17. Land N. Gipervirus / per. s angl. D. Khamisa // Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 2: Kibergotika. Perm': Gile Press, 2018a. S. 117–125.

18. Land N. Gipervirus [Gipervirus], transl. from English by D. Hamis. Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. [Works: in 6 vols.]. Vol. 2: Kibergotika [CyberGothic]. Perm: Gile Press Publ., 2018. P. 117–125.

19. Land N. KiberGotika / per. s angl. D. Khamisa // Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 2: Kibergotika. Perm': Gile Press, 2018b. S. 81–110.

20. Land N. KiberGotika [CyberGothic], transl. from English by D. Hamis. Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. [Works: in 6 vols.]. Vol. 2: Kibergotika [CyberGothic]. Perm: Gile Press Publ., 2018. P. 81–110.

21. Land N. Mashinnoe zhelanie / per. s angl. D. Khamisa // Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 2: Kibergotika. Perm': Gile Press, 2018v. S. 57–80.

22. Land N. Mashinnoe zhelanie [Machinic Desire], transl. from English by D. Hamis. Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. [Works: in 6 vols.]. Vol. 2: Kibergotika [CyberGothic]. Perm: Gile Press Publ., 2018. P. 57–80.

23. Land N. Stsepleniya / per. s angl. D. Khamisa // Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 2: Kibergotika. Perm': Gile Press, 2018g. S. 31–56.

24. Land N. Scepleniya [Clutch], transl. from English by D. Hamis. Land N. Soch.: v 6 t. [Works: in 6 vols.]. Vol. 2: Kibergotika [CyberGothic]. Perm: Gile Press Publ., 2018. P. 31–56.

25. Luman N. Real'nost' massmedia / Per. s nem. A.Yu. Antonovskogo. M.: Praksis, 2005.

26. Luhmann N. Real'nost' massmedia [The Reality of the Mass Media], transl. from German by A.Yu. Antonovsky. Moscow: Praksis Publ., 2005.

27. Obolkina S.V. Topos «kiborga»: Evropa vs Aziya // Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2020. № 4. S. 14–34.

28. Obolkina S.V. “Topos ‘kiborga’: Evropa vs Aziya” [The Cyborg’s Topos: Europe vs Asia]. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2020. N 4. P. 14–34.

29. Savchuk V.V. Topologicheskaya refleksiya. M.: Kanon + ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2012a.

30. Savchuk V.V. Topologicheskaya reflksiya [Topological Reflection]. Moscow: Canon + ROOI “Rehabilitation” Publ., 2012.

31. Savchuk V.V. Filosofiya ehpokhi novykh media // Voprosy filosofii. 2012b. № 10. S. 33–42.

32. Savchuk V.V. “Filosofiya epohi novyh media” [Philosophy of the new media era]. Voprosy filosofii. 2012. N 10. P. 33–42.

33. Svoboda oshibat'sya // Virtual Museum of Digital Art.18.01.2021 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://museumofdigital.art/glitch/ (data obrascheniya: 03.03.2021).

34. “Svoboda oshibat'sya” [Freedom to make mistakes]. Virtual Museum of Digital Art. January 18, 2021 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://museumofdigital.art/glitch/ (date of access: 03.03.2021).

35. Fedorov V.A. Analiz audiovizual'nykh mediatekstov. M.: MOO «Informatsiya dlya vsekh», 2012.

36. Fedorov A. Analiz audiovizual'nyh mediatekstov [Analysis of Audiovisual Media Texts]. Moscow: MOO «Informaciya dlya vsekh» Publ., 2012.

37. Kharauehj D. Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i sotsialisticheskij feminizm 1980-kh / per. s angl. A.V. Garadzha. M.: «Ad Marginem Press», 2016.

38. Haraway D. Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiya i socialisticheskij feminizm 1980-h. [A Cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century], transl. from English by A.V. Garadzha. Moscow: «Ad Marginem Press» Publ., 2016.

39. Khoruzhij S.S. Problema Postcheloveka, ili Transformativnaya antropologiya glazami sinergijnoj antropologii // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. № 2. C. 10–31.

40. Khoruzhy S.S. “Problema Postcheloveka, ili Transformativnaya antropologiya glazami sinergijnoj antropologii” [The Problem of Post-Human, or Transformtative Anthropology in the Light of Synergetic Anthropology]. Filosofskie nauki. 2008. N 2. P. 10–31.

41. Khukhtamo Eh. Po tu storonu mediuma. Iskusstvo, nauka i voobrazhaemoe tekhnokul'tury / per. s angl. I. Khadikova // Artgid. 14.02.2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://artguide.com/posts/1190#footnote-14 (data obrascheniya: 03.03.2021).

42. Huhtamo E. “Po tu storonu mediuma. Iskusstvo, nauka i voobrazhaemoe tekhnokul'tury” [On the other Side of the Medium. Art, Science and the Imaginary Technoculture], transl. from English by I. Hadikov. Artguide. February 14, 2017 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://artguide.com/posts/1190#footnote-14 (date of access: 03.03.2021).

43. Ehpshtejn M. Debut de siecle, ili Ot Post- k Proto-. Manifest novogo veka // Znamya. 2001. № 5. S. 180–198. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/znamia/2001/5/de-but-de-siesle-ili-ot-post-k-proto-manifest-novogo-veka.html (data obrascheniya: 03.03.2021).

44. Epstein M. “Debut de siecle, ili Ot Post- k Proto-. Manifest novogo veka” [Debut de siecle, or From Post- to Proto-. New Age Manifesto]. Znamya. 2001. N 5. P. 180–198. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/znamia/2001/5/de-but-de-siesle-ili-ot-post-k-proto-manifest-novogo-veka.html (date of access: 03.03.2021).

45. Yung K.G. Mysterium Coniunctionis. Tainstvo vossoedineniya / Per. s nem. A.A. Spektora. Minsk: OOO «Kharvest», 2003.

46. Jung K.G. Mysterium Coniunctionis. Tainstvo vossoedineniya [Mysterium Coniunctionis], transl. from German by A.A. Spektor. Minsk: OOO «Harvest» Publ., 2003.

47. Aarseth E.J. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.

48. Clynes M.E., Kline N.S. Cyborgs and space. Astronautics. September 1960. P. 26–76.

49. Harman G. The Third Table = Der dritte Tisch. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, 2012.

50. Huhtamo E.& Parikka J. Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2011.

51. Menkman R. The Glitch Moment(um), Network Notebooks 04. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2011.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate