Везде
DO WE NEED A NEW PARADIGM OF SOCIOLOGY? (REFLECTING ON AN U.BECK'S CONCEPT)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
DO WE NEED A NEW PARADIGM OF SOCIOLOGY? (REFLECTING ON AN U.BECK'S CONCEPT)
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000375-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg N. Yanitsky 
Edition
Volume 384 Issue 4
Pages
13-22
Abstract
The article analyzes theoretical and methodological toolkit of “cosmopolitan sociology” proposed by Ulrich Beck (1944-2015); reviewed and commented are its key concepts: anthropological shock, future, global risk, the cosmopolitan community, metamorfosis, paradigm shift, social metabolism and social order. The author concludes that heuristic potential of evolutionary sociology has not yet been exhausted, its tools are still suitable for studying global challenges, critical transformation of social order, processes of social metabolism, as well as for building models of desired futures.
Keywords
anthropological shock, future; global risks, cosmopolitan sociology, metabolism, social order
Date of publication
01.04.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
507
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0132-16250000375-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 06.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Ermolaeva P.O. Social'no-ekologicheskij metabolizm gorodov: konceptualizaciya, nauchnye shkoly, sovremennye zarubezhnye issledovaniya // Sociologicheskaya nauka i social'naya praktika. 2015. № 3(11). S. 34–50.


Murunov S. Iz chego sostoyat rossijskie goroda i kak lokal'nye soobshchestva mogut izmenit' ih oblik. 2015. Biblioteka. URL: http://lenta.ru/articles/2015/05/24/urban/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.4.15).


Razvitie detskogo i molodezhnogo ekologicheskogo dvizheniya. VII Mezhdunarodnaya konferenciya po ekologicheskomu obrazovaniyu. Tezisy dokladov. SPb: Izd-vo “Krismas+”, 2001.


Chizhevskij A. Fizicheskie faktory istoricheskogo processa. Kaluga: Pervaya gostipolitografiya, 1926.


Chizhevskij A. Zemnoe ekho solnechnyh bur'. M.: Mysl', 1964.


Yanickij O.N. Sovremennaya vojna: vzglyad sociologa // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 5. S. 176–185.


Beck U. Re-mapping Inequality and Power in an Age of Climate Change: The Emergence of ‘Cosmopolitan’ Risk Communities. Lecture at the ISA World Congress of Sociology, 11–17 July, 2010. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.


Beck U., Levy D. Cosmopolitanized nations: Re-imagining collectivity in world risk society. 2013. URL: http://tcs.sagepub.com/context/early/2013/02/07/0263276412457223 (data obrashcheniya: 13.5.14).


BeckU. Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society // Current Sociology. 2015. № 63 (1). R. 75–88.


Bleicher A., Gross M. Response and recovery in the remediation of contaminated land in Eastern Germany // Dowty R.A., Allen B.L. (eds). Dynamics of Disaster. Lessons on Risk, Response and Recovery. London, Washington, DC: Earthscan, 2010. R. 187–202.


Burawoy M. Rejoinder: For a subaltern global sociology? // Current Sociology. 2008. № 56 (3). R. 435– 444.


Burawoy M. Facing the unequal world // Current Sociology. 2015. № 63 (1). R. 5–34.


Hodgkinson P., Stewart M. Coping with catastrophe. London, New York: Routledge, 1991.


Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.


Kaldor M., H. Anheier, M. Glasius, eds. Global Civil Society Yearbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.


Keen D. Complex Emergences. Cambridge: Polity, 2008. Newcombe K. Kalma J., Aston A. The metabolism of a city: the case of Hong Kong. Ambio 7. 1978. R. 3–15.


Martinez-Alier J. Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Languages of Valuation // Capitalism Nature Socialism. 2009. № 20 (1). R. 58–87.


Phillips B. Disaster Recovery. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group), 2009.


Schultz M. Future moves: Forward-oriented studies of culture, society, and technology // Current Sociology Monograph. 2015. № 62 (2). R. 129–139.


UNESCO. 2001. Bridging Research and Policy, MOST Annual Report. URL: www.unesco.org/most/ annualpeport2002.htm (data obrashcheniya: 23. 3.15)


Wolman A. The Metabolism of the Cities // Scientific American. 1965. № 213 (3). R. 178–193.


Yanitsky O. Risk-solidarities: The Russian Version // Inter. 2004. № 2–3. R. 155–163.


Yanitsky O. A Primary Eco-Structure: The Concept and its Testing // Social Analysis. 2012. № 2 (2). R. 7–24. URL: http://cirworld.com/journals/index.php/jssr/article/view/3680/pdf_99 (data obrashcheniya: 21.4.15).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate