Везде
Procedural means of combating extremism
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Procedural means of combating extremism
Annotation
PII
S0018238-1-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ladmila Bormotova 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6003-2675
Affiliation: Orenburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Orenburg
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
183-187
Abstract

In this article, using the comparative legal method, criminal procedural measures to counter extremist crimes are considered. For this purpose, the legislation of several States belonging to different legal families has been studied. The author concludes that in the global trends of countering extremism and terrorism, there is an active inclusion in the criminal procedure sphere not only measures to identify and solve crimes of the designated orientation, but also recompesatory technologies are being introduced. Under them, in the most general form, it is proposed to understand a kind of rejection of the procedural form in general or its replacement with non-traditional tools in favor of the final result in a criminal case.

Similar means of combating extremism abroad take place where police and judicial discretion is developed, which significantly differs from the formalization of criminal investigation and judicial proceedings. There is no special procedural form for criminal cases on extremism or terrorism in the Russian Federation. The criminal procedure legislation provides for the possibility of concluding a pre-trial cooperation agreement and the adoption of a final decision by the court in such a case in a special order. Foreign mechanisms are much broader and depend on the discretion of the law enforcement officer. At the same time, in addition to the court, the right to simplify or complicate procedures may belong to the prosecutor’s office or even the police. This, according to the author, is the fundamental difference in approaches to combating extremist crimes and at the same time a direction for thinking about the possibilities of implementing effective means into domestic legislation and practice.

Keywords
fight against extremism, investigation of extremist crimes, comparative studies, recompensation
Received
14.01.2022
Date of publication
15.03.2023
Number of purchasers
14
Views
341
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0018238-1-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 14.03.2023
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Akhpanov A.N., Khan A.L. On strengthening criminal procedural means of countering extremism and terrorism // Herald of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2019. No. 1 (55). P. 79 (in Russ.).

2. Bastrykin A.I. Modern ways of countering terrorism and extremism // Actual problems of Russ. law 2021. No. 6. P. 167 - 170 (in Russ.).

3. Zherebilo T.V. Dictionary of linguistic terms. 5th ed., rev. and add. Nazran, 2010. P. 33 (in Russ.).

4. Klebanov L.R. Problems of combating crime in the XXI century: Criminal Law, criminal procedure and criminalistic solutions // Herald of the RUDN. Ser.: Legal Sciences. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 186 - 192. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-1-186-192 (in Russ.).

5. Kravtsov D. Yu. The practice of countering extremism in different countries // NB: Administrative Law and practice of administration. 2019. No. 4. P. 24 (in Russ.).

6. Kulbaev A.K. Criminal Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic 2017: novels: educational and practical manual. Bishkek, 2018. P. 32 - 34 (in Russ.).

7. Petryanin A.V. Interaction of internal affairs bodies with representatives of traditional religious confessions in the field of countering extremism // Legal science and practice. Herald of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. No. 4 (40). P. 316, 317 (in Russ.).

8. Redko A.A., Yalovenko T.V., Hasankadiev T.G. Priority directions of state policy on the observance of human rights in the context of countering terrorism and extremism // Herald of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019. No. 2 (49). P. 15-21. DOI: 10.25724/VAMVD.HJKL (in Russ.).

9. Khruleva V.V., Maslov I.S. On some problems of combating religious extremism in the penal system of the Russian Federation // Penitentiary Science. 2019. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 355 - 360 (in Russ.).

10. An Exploratory Study of Possible Correlates of Individual Whistleblowing Propensity Among Sworn Staff in a City Jail / J.B. Wells, K.I. Minor, A.Reeves, E.G. Lambert // Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0887403420919478

11. Calderoni F., Superchi E. The nature of organized crime leadership: criminal leaders in meeting and wiretap networks // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 72. No. 4. P. 419 - 444. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-019-09829-6

12. Hardimam-Mccartney A. Controlling control orders: article 5 ECHR and the prevention of terrorism act 2005 // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2007. Vol. 66. No. 1. P. 6 - 8. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197307000219

13. Gatti M. The Log in Your Eye: Is Europe’s External Promotion of Religious Freedom Consistent With its Internal Practice? // European Law Journal. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 250 - 267. DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12162

14. Nickerson C. Media portrayal of terrorism and Muslims: a content analysis of Turkey and France // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2019. Vol. 72. No. 5. P. 547 - 567. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-019-09837-6

15. Onat I., Gul Z. Terrorism Risk Forecasting by Ideology // European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 433 - 449. DOI: 10.1007/s10610-017-9368-8

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate