Везде
BUSINESSMEN IN REPRESENTATIVES STATE BODIES OF RUSSIAN REGIONS: NUMBERS AND INCOMES FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
BUSINESSMEN IN REPRESENTATIVES STATE BODIES OF RUSSIAN REGIONS: NUMBERS AND INCOMES FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000375-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Maria Sakaeva 
Edition
Volume 384 Issue 4
Pages
142-146
Abstract
If business owner decides to become a member of regional and municipal legislative bodies, it means that institutional division between politics and economics is weak. The research is about the phenomenon (political and economical at the same time) within Russian local communities - numerous entrepreneurs within regional parliaments and municipal legislative bodies. Numbers, gathered by the author, have showed that small and large business is interested in political participation and their representatives are likely to be elected to regional parliaments. Qualitative data illustrate the picture in one federal okrug. Using the theory of property rights and qualitative data, the author analyzes what kind of opportunities an entrepreneur with political status has in order to protect his (her) property rights. Qualitative research was made in two Russian cities and shows the reality both in large and small towns. Research is questioning conditions and interests, which entrepreneurs have moving to politics. Finally, it was figured out, that parliament is the window of opportunities, which requires following particular game rules. The research found out that entrepreneurs are interested in deputy status under three conditions: high risks of business activity, low level protection of private property and widespread practices of 'privatization' of institutions by groups, individuals and organizations. Entrepreneurs are interested in deputy mandate, because it lets them to avoid or minimize risks, produced by the state and market.
Keywords
entrepreneurship, business environment, informal relations, deputies, regional parliament
Date of publication
01.04.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
391
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Barsukova S.Yu. Tenevye pravila vzaimootnoshenij politikov i predprinimatelej // Zhurnal institucional'nyh issledovanij. 2011. T. 3. № 3. S. 40–56.


Volkov V.V. Vliyanie social'nogo statusa podsudimogo na reshenie suda // Zhurnal sociologii i social'noj antropologii // 2014. № 4. S. 62–85.


Kravcova M.V. Korrupciya v policii: transformaciya otnoshenij s biznesom // Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya. 2012. T. 12. № 2. S. 82–99.


Kynev A.V. Vybory regional'nyh parlamentov v Rossii 2009–2013: ot partizacii k personalizacii. M.: Panorama, 2014.


Levin S.N., Kagan E.S., Kislicyn D.V. Internalizovannyj politicheskij resurs krupnogo biznesa v Kuzbasse // EKO. 2014. № 1. S. 85–94.


Levin S.N., Kurbatova M.V. Setevye vzaimosvyazi rossijskogo biznesa: delovaya korrupciya i organicheskij institut real'noj modeli institucional'noj organizacii rossijskoj ekonomiki // Zhurnal institucional'nyh issledovanij. 2011. T. 3. № 2. S. 50–69.


Nort D., Uollis Dzh., Vajngast B. Nasilie i social'nye poryadki. Konceptual'nye ramki dlya interpretacii pis'mennoj istorii chelovechestva. M.: Izdatel'stvo instituta Gajdara, 2011.


Olejnik A.A. Rynok kak mekhanizm vosproizvodstva vlasti // Pro et Contra. 2008. № 2–3. S. 88– 107.


Paneyah E.Ya. Pravila igry dlya russkogo predprinimatelya. M.: Kolibri, 2008.


Sakaeva M.M. Parlament kak “okno vozmozhnostej”: issledovanie povedeniya predprinimatelej s deputatskim mandatom v hode realizacii rynochnyh interesov // Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya. 2012. T. 13. № 3. S. 96–123.


Tev D.B. Vladel'cy i developery nedvizhimosti Kaliningrada: svyazi s vlast'yu i politicheskie vygody // Politicheskaya nauka. 2008. № 3. S. 175–193.


Tev D.B. Partii “vtorogo eshelona” v regional'nyh parlamentah: osobennosti bassejna rekrutirovaniya deputatov KPRF, Spravedlivoj Rossii i LDPR // Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Politologiya”. 2012. № 1(17). S. 98–111.


Chirikova A.E. Putinskie reformy i poziciya regional'nyh elit v Rossii // Mir Rossii. 2006. T. 15. № 1. S. 3–28.


Chirikova A.E., Ledyaev V.G., Sel'cer D.G. Vlast' v malom rossijskom gorode: konfiguraciya i vzaimodejstvie osnovnyh aktorov // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 2. S. 88–105.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate